Wednesday Night Bible Study: Matthew 13-14

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Last week, we got through chapter 12 and left me not particularly caring for Jesus’ attitude. We’ll pick up this week in chapter 13, which can be found here. (Feel free to follow along and add any comments if you think I missed anything interesting!)

Chapter 13

Jesus is apparently having a busy day. After all that he did in last week’s study, he went to sit by a lake the same day (a very important detail, you understand! After all, the Bible can hold only so many words, and it’s much more important to give a timeline than to prohibit slavery!). Apparently, so many people came to listen to him speak, that he was forced out onto the lake in a boat. Now, I don’t know what your experience with boats is, but I do know that they aren’t very stable. It’s hard to listen to someone in a boat while they are bobbing around the water. And having grown up on the banks of the Arkansas River, I can tell you that sound tends to get lost a bit in the wind that blows off the water. I don’t know how people would have heard him over the wind and creakiness of the boat and the waves splashing up against the shore, but whatever. This is Jesus, after all. He probably had a built in mic.

So he tells them all a parable about how people hear The Word. After, his disciples ask him why he talks in parables. I can see why pastors often say it’s because they’re interesting and people like to listen to stories, because you couldn’t have gotten a more rambly, incoherent answer written in there. He rambles for twelve verses about how the disciples are oh, so blessed to have wisdom other people don’t. Then he tells them, “Whoever has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.” Then he quotes a prophecy and explains what the above parable meant. Which is actually slightly different than how I’ve heard it explained and makes less sense then how I’ve heard it explained. But whatever.

Then he tells several more parables. The first is about a bunch of weeds some douchebag planted along with good seeds. The owner tells the servant to let it all grow together, and at harvest time, they will bundle it up separately and burn the weeds. Then he tells the story of a mustard seed that grows to a big tree even though it’s a small seed and how yeast gets mixed in to flour to make dough. Ummm, okay. I have no.freaking.clue how that is supposed to be like the kingdom of heaven. And yeast doesn’t make dough, it causes the dough to rise. Next, it says that Jesus didn’t talk to anyone without using a parable. Well, of course! Through parables, you can make the most trivial things sound profound. Seriously? Yeast in dough? That’s the best the God of the universe could come up with to illustrate what heaven is like?

After that, Jesus explains to his disciples the meaning of the parable of the weeds, basically saying that the weeds are bad people that will go to hell, and the good seed is good people that get to go to heaven. Profound, profound. How can anybody read the Bible and not see that Jesus is the Son of God. (Smirk.)

On to two more parables, which basically say that heaven is awesome. Of course, he can’t just say heaven rocks, he has to use pearls and treasure to illustrate it. Not just pearls or just treasure, but both.

The last parable is the parable of the net, which yet again, illustrates the kingdom of heaven (yeah, I got it back at the weeds). It’s a lovely one:

Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the fiery furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Of course, since everyone is evil (see Jeremiah 17:9; I had to learn that verse in elementary school, lucky me), we’re all doomed.

So Jesus then goes into the synagogue and amazes everyone there. We learn that Jesus has at least six siblings, as four brothers are named, and they talk about multiple sisters.

The end of Chapter 13.

Chapter 14

Matthew 14 can be found here.

I confess, I am getting a bit bored of Matthew. Jesus is not particularly nice or profound, but everyone is oh, so amazed at his spiritual knowledge. You know, like making yeast bread. But Matthew 14 opens up with the beheading of Herod, so this chapter already gets off on a bit more interesting note. Herod’s daughter begged him to kill John the Baptist because her mother wanted him dead. I wonder why Herodias cared so much? She was a queen. Who cared if some crazy dude who ate locusts in the desert said her marriage to Herod was unlawful? But I guess it was a different culture! Anyways, John the Baptist is dead and Jesus is sad. He tries to grieve quietly, but people follow him. Finally, we see him have mercy and compassion again and he heals a bunch of people. After healing and preaching, people get hungry. So he takes 5 loaves and 2 fish and feeds 5000 people. Okay. Stop. 1) Did only one or two people out 5,000 seriously think to bring some lunch? How did the disciples know that there were only 5 loaves and 2 fish? Did they ask everybody there? They answered Jesus awfully fast to know that’s all the food they had. I find that suspicious. 2) Where did 5,000 people come from? Did no one have jobs? This wasn’t modern day industrialized Western world. This is back in the day where there was a 6 day work week, and the seventh day was the Sabbath. No chasing after Jesus allowed. I find it difficult to believe that so many people traveled but only one of them brought food. Heck, stupid people who didn’t think, “Hey, I’m traveling all the way over here even though I live way over here. Maybe I ought to bring a lunch!” deserve to starve. ;) And how did they know there were 5,000? Sure, it’s Jesus, and Jesus ought to know. But Jesus would know an exact number. I find it hard to believe that there were exactly 5,000 people on the dot. And when you’re outdoors, how does 5,000 people look compared to 3,500? Or heck, even 5,500? I find this 5,000 people claim dubious.

Okay, I’m over the ridiculous 5,000 people story. Because if you think that was awesome, just wait until you hear how Jesus walked on water. Because he so did. He was probably exhausted and sick of all the whiny people who wanted to be healed and eat food, so he prays for awhile, sending his disciples ahead of him. Several hours later, he decides he’s ready to join them again and walks to them on the water. Um, they were several hours ahead of him. In a boat that the Bible clearly states is going at a good pace. Jesus would have had to be running on the water, not just walking. So Peter thinks this is awesome and tries to do it, too. It works until he doubts and he starts to sink. Instead of positive reinforcement–after all, Peter was the only disciples with the balls to get out of the boat at all, Jesus kind of mocks him a little bit for doubting.

Then they go and heal a bunch of people. The end of chapter 14.

So, what do you think?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Tags: ,

13 Responses to “Wednesday Night Bible Study: Matthew 13-14”

  1. Googlesironman Says:

    “Apparently, so many people came to listen to him speak, that he was forced out onto the lake in a boat.”…. Last time I checked, this guy could “walk” on water… whats the boat for?

  2. ZDENNY Says:

    I find it ironic that you started with Matthew. Most liberals believe this is the best book in the Bible.

  3. Laura Says:

    ? I chose it because all of the conservative preachers and teachers I heard always told brand new Christians to start reading in Matthew, not Genesis. That and becasue Josh McDowell supposedly went from atheist to Christian after reading Matthew. I wanted to see if I could see what he saw in it. Um, nope!

  4. Sarge Says:

    A female friend says the thing about the yeast/dough shows his human side.

    He’s a GUY! About bread and practical, kitchen things he’s clueless. What do you expect? ;-)

  5. David McNerney Says:

    “It works until he doubts and he starts to sink.”

    Let me get this straight – Peter is actually walking on water and then he starts doubting…

    I have zero faith in this malarky – but if I was walking on water I’d have to say it would increase my faith in the process. On top of which this guy is a fisherman – are we supposed to believe that this is the first time he’s come across a “wind boisterous”? A mate of mine is a fisherman and he can tell you all about wind – boisterous and then some.

    This is a big problem I have with this faith business. We are told over and over about these great heroes of Christianity, but they had to be given tons and tons of evidence before they believed anything. And then the rest of us are told to rely solely on “faith”.

  6. Rosa Says:

    I do like the net metaphor. The people (fish) God likes get …eaten? Left to die in baskets? And the bad ones get thrown back into the lake.

  7. Laura Says:

    lmao, Rosa. Nice catch (no pun intended). :D

  8. mlee Says:

    I think it’s sad that John the baptist didn’t have enough faith to break his shackles and escape, if only he’d had a mustard seed’s worth. It’s equally sad that jesus wasn’t able to raise John from the dead. I guess he couldn’t because they had used an iron sword.

  9. Eamon Knight Says:

    I chose it because all of the conservative preachers and teachers I heard always told brand new Christians to start reading in Matthew, not Genesis.

    First book I was told to read was John.

    And maybe ZD thinks Andy Schlafly should just take Matthew out of his Conservative Bible.

  10. mlee Says:

    ZDenny,

    Us heathen liberals are usually too busy eating dead babies and having sex with animals to read the bible much. We don’t really have to anyway, Satan tells us the oral version around the campfire while cooking the missionaries.

  11. Eamon Knight Says:

    I do like the net metaphor. The people (fish) God likes get …eaten? Left to die in baskets? And the bad ones get thrown back into the lake.

    Sounds like an early precursor to the Lovecraftian eschatology ;-) .
    See: http://www.rubbersuitstudios.com/ptcct.htm

  12. Kathryn Says:

    Is Matthew the one who says something like “the number of persons fed was 5000 men, not counting the women and children”? Because that’s my FAVORITE.

  13. OneSmallStep Says:

    **Jesus is not particularly nice or profound, but everyone is oh, so amazed at his spiritual knowledge. **

    Something just occurred to me upon reading this … what are they basing this “amazement” on? Time and time again, Jesus says a parable, no one gets it, Jesus explains it, people are amazed. But if Jesus is the one telling you what the parable means, how do you confirm that he actually has the knowledge? If you don’t get the parable in the first place, then how are you to know that Jesus’s explanation is correct? He could’ve easily said that “this parable means God will inspire Barney the Dinosaur in 2,000 years.”

    **after all, Peter was the only disciples with the balls to get out of the boat at all, Jesus kind of mocks him a little bit for doubting.**

    Isn’t Jesus supposed to be the same guy who has never-ending patience and understands that people can’t be perfect? Because this is more of a “zero tolerance for failure” policy and as soon as you fail, he’s happy to tell you what a loser you are.

Leave a Reply